Best Value Performance Plan 2001
Community consultation
When the Council was established in 1998 we made the following commitment to the people of
Worcestershire:
In addition to our own commitment we are required to consult with the public,
representative organisations and interest groups to ensure that we provide best value
services.
Last year our auditors told us that we should develop a corporate consultation strategy
that would offer guidance and support to our officers involved in consulting the public.
The strategy is now in place and it will make our consultation results more effective. We
have also created a consultation database that is helping us to plan and co-ordinate
future consultation.
Some of the proposals upon which we have consulted during the year include:
- the Council's budget strategy - we consulted council taxpayers, business ratepayers, service users and a wide range of
special interest groups. Their views were fed into the budget making process and helped
the Council to determine its budget strategy for the forthcoming year.
- best value reviews - we are committed to consulting users and others affected by our services as part of the
Best Value Review process. Throughout the year there has been detailed consultation with
interest groups in relation to all Best Value reviews. In all cases the views expressed
during consultation have been used to inform the outcome of reviews.
- the impact of flooding in Worcestershire - following the severe flooding of Worcestershire during Autumn 2000, the County Council
consulted the public and its staff about what can be done or what should be done to reduce
the impact of flooding in future.
Many people took the time to tell us what they thought. All the ideas were collected
together and put into a paper that was sent to the Prime Minister and other people who
have responsibility for the effects of flooding in the County.
The County Council has represented the people of Worcestershire in negotiations with the
organisations with responsibility and will convene a monitoring conference in the spring
to monitor progress.
- citizens' panel - we also consulted our standing panel of 2,000 residents. On two occasions we surveyed
their opinions and used the information to help determine our future priorities and design
our services.
- political structures - the Government has asked local councils to change the way they make decisions. During
February and March 2001, we worked in partnership with four of the six district councils
in the County, to undertake a wide-ranging public consultation. The purpose of the
consultation was to ask residents to vote on which of three options for decision-making
they believed to be best for their district council and the County Council.
Questionnaires were sent to households throughout the County, a web page was installed on
the CountyWide Information System (available at all libraries), and local newsletters also
asked people to vote.
In addition, presentations were made to parish councils, business forums, and other
'stakeholder' groups and 'communities of interest'- such as tenants' groups, local
volunteer networks and support groups in all six district council areas, so that everyone
had the chance to voice their opinion.
The results of the consultation will not be available until May and taking account of the
views expressed, we will decide in June our proposals for the way in which decisions are
taken by the Council in future.
What you have told us - and what we've done about it
The May 2000 Citizens' Panel revealed that:
Street lighting
- 73% of panel members feel that the street lighting in their road is good/ adequate.
We think that this is a good starting point from which to improve. We will now review the
service during 2002, incorporate these findings and examine potential areas for
improvement.
- 79% said that the current level of delays at junctions controlled by traffic lights was
acceptable.
- Overall respondents felt that repairs to traffic lights should take less than two hours.
- Suggestions were made for additional facilities for disabled persons at existing crossings
and where new crossings should be sited.
The time we take to repair traffic lights will now be reviewed as part of a new contract
being negotiated. Tactile aids are being fitted to all crossings where sound 'bleepers'
may be dangerous for the partially sighted or blind persons to use, and we are
investigating suggestions for additional crossing points.
Lifelong learning
- 84% of respondents had seen information about lifelong learning courses and training in
the newspaper but only 20% had made use of it.
- 22% of respondents were actively involved in some form of learning.
Working with partners we have set up additional community based learning opportunities in
Worcester, Redditch and Bromsgrove, and appointed officers in Malvern Hills, Wyre Forest
and Wychavon to offer initial advice and guidance.
Libraries
- Only 10% of respondents said that they had used the Internet facilities that the Council
provides free of charge in libraries.
We have introduced taster sessions tailored for individual needs at those branches with
terminals. In addition, the introduction of a considerable number of terminals throughout
the library network is being promoted through a marketing campaign to increase take up and
awareness of this service.
Sustainability
- 60% of people aged over 65 claim to know what sustainability is, whereas only 48% of
people aged 18 to 29 do so.
We have now developed an Education for Sustainable Development strategy and we are
researching how we can best assist local business in supporting the sustainability agenda.
We have also produced a good news guide to promote best practice in sustainability,
invited parish, town councils and community groups to attend our sustainability training
programme, worked with the business community to improve sustainability performance and
established an annual award to recognise sustainability improvements in business.
In
November 2000 we carried out the
second Citizens' Panel survey of the year. The purpose of the survey was to seek views of satisfaction with council
services. All other councils have carried out the same survey but few results have yet
been published. We have therefore compared our results with the results of a national
pilot study conducted by MORI (an independent market research company).
From the research undertaken by MORI it has been possible to compare our results with
other county councils, in some cases, but in others (because the data is not available) we
have compared our performance with that of all local authorities including district
councils. Where the results are compared with the results of all types of local
authorities we have underlined the word council. In all other cases the comparison is with
other county councils.
The survey revealed that:
- 67.5% of the public are satisfied with the council as a whole compared to MORI results of a
county council average of 54%.
- 32.8% of the public are satisfied with complaint handling of all departments compared to MORI results of a county council
average of 31%.
- 73.5% of the public are satisfied with the overall civic amenity site service compared to MORI
results of a council average of 69%.
- 68.5% of the public are satisfied with the Council's performance in keeping public land free
from litter compared to MORI results of a council average of 56%.
- 56% of the public who had seen it are satisfied with public transport information compared to
MORI results of a council average of 58%.
- 47.5% of the public who had used local bus services in the last year are satisfied with the
service compared to MORI results of a council average of 51%.
- 77.7% of the public who had used the library service were satisfied with the service compared
with MORI results of a council average level of satisfaction of 80%.
We are very pleased that so many of you are satisfied with the services we provide as a
whole. We will continue to do the best we can to maintain your satisfaction and to
continue to deliver best value services building upon the progress we have made during the
last three years.
Although we have not yet had the opportunity to analyse the figures in detail, we will try
to improve on all these results. In particular we will look at those areas where we fell
below the average to see how we can improve and ensure that you are satisfied with those
services. You will see from the performance indicator section later in this document the
detailed targets for improvement we have set ourselves.
Future consultation
We intend to build on the progress we have made in consulting the people of
Worcestershire. Our priority areas for development include:
- improving information provision about the County Council and its work so that people are
better informed about what we do.
- increasing face to face contact with the public.
- strengthening links with the business community.
- developing IT links.
- working with schools to develop community links.
- developing links with hard to reach groups.
During 2001/02 we will also introduce a new consultation database to provide us with
information on planned consultation exercises. This will enable all staff to see at a
glance what is being proposed. This information can then be used by staff to consider
whether there would be any benefit in participating in any of the planned consultation
exercises for their own purposes and whether other partners should be invited to join in
the consultation.
If you require details of our consultation strategy or about individual consultation
exercises please contact the Policy Unit at County Hall. Tel: 01905 766680
.
Page Information:Last modification: 12:07:28, 14th October, 2005 by
Web Team Review date: 13th December, 2005